Economic Security

Using the charts: Items in the legend below the chart can be clicked on and off to aid in analysis. The chart can also be printed or exported as an image or document using the menu at the top right. See a Guide to the ACT Rochester Website for more information.




Source: U.S. Census Bureau

What does this measure?

The proportion of households broken out by race and ethnicity that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps).

Why is this important?

The SNAP program provides government funding for low-income people to buy food. It therefore is an indication of how many people in a region rely on government assistance to meet their basic needs.

How is our region performing?

In 2013-17, 43% of black or African-Americans and 41% of Hispanic or Latinos in our region participated in the SNAP program, in comparison to 10% of whites. While white participation rates were on par with state and national levels, Hispanic or Latino and black or African American participation rates were roughly 1.5 that of state and national levels. Hispanic or Latino participation at the regional level increased by 7 percentage points from 2008-12 to 2013-17, a greater increase than Hispanic or Latino participation at the state or national level over the same time frame.

Within our region, Monroe County had a participation rate of 44% for blacks or African-Americans and 43% for Hispanic or Latinos, compared to a rate of 9% for whites. This is largely driven by the City of Rochester, which had a rate of 50% for black or African-Americans and 52% for Hispanic or Latinos, and a rate of 24% for whites.

Notes about the data

The Census Bureau asks people to identify their race (white, African American, etc.) separate from their ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic). So the totals for these categories cannot be added together, as people show up in both a racial and ethnic group.

The multiyear figures are from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS). Studies have found that ACS estimates of enrollment in public benefit programs tend to underestimate the true rate. The estimates reported above should be considered a lower bound of the true estimate. The bureau combined five years of responses to the survey to provide estimates for smaller geographic areas and increase the precision of its estimates. However, because the information came from a survey, the samples responding to the survey were not always large enough to produce reliable results, especially in small geographic areas. CGR has noted on data tables the estimates with relatively large margins of error. Estimates with three asterisks have the largest margins, plus or minus 50% or more of the estimate. Two asterisks mean plus or minus 35%-50%, and one asterisk means plus or minus 20%-35%. For all estimates, the confidence level is 90%, meaning there is 90% probability the true value (if the whole population were surveyed) would be within the margin of error (or confidence interval). The survey provides data on characteristics of the population that used to be collected only during the decennial census. Data for this indicator are expected to be released in December.

Households Receiving SNAP by Race/Ethnicity, 2013-17
AsianBlack or African AmericanLatino or HispanicWhite
United States7%27%22%10%
NYS14%28%31%10%
NYS (excluding NYC)8%29%20%9%
Region11%**43%41%10%
Monroe12%**44%43%9%
Surrounding Counties8%******39%35%11%
Genesee11%******48%****22%******11%
Livingston8%******50%******41%****13%
Ontario7%******31%**49%**9%
Orleans4%******36%******25%******16%
Seneca23%******55%******39%******11%
Wayne3%******40%****26%****11%
WyomingN/A******25%******9%******10%
YatesN/A******N/A******43%******12%
Rochester31%**50%52%24%
Batavia33%******60%****36%******21%
CanandaiguaN/A******54%******53%******13%
Geneva37%******47%****51%**17%**

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Notes: Multiyear results are from rolling American Community Survey. * Margin of error between 20% & 35% of estimate; ** margin of error between 35% & 50%; *** margin of error greater than 50%. The Census Bureau asks people to identify their race (white, African-American, etc.) separate from their ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic). So the totals for these categories cannot be added together, as people show up in both a racial and ethnic group.




Number of Households Receiving SNAP by Race/Ethnicity, 2013-17
AsianBlack or African AmericanLatino or HispanicWhite
United States403,3853,922,0033,256,9429,067,986
NYS69,995301,373343,584516,220
NYS (excluding NYC)9,73196,98563,766328,400
Region1,055**19,4839,69441,868
Monroe972**18,1408,22922,413
Surrounding Counties83******1,3431,46519,455
Genesee12******293****98******2,558
Livingston21******151******198****3,019
Ontario23******290**659**3,606
Orleans4******193******122******2,438
Seneca18******66******85******1,434
Wayne5******345****227****3,717
Wyoming0******5******17******1,621
Yates0******0******59******1,062
Rochester550**15,6036,45711,034
Batavia8******204****62******1,139
Canandaigua0******26******52******592
Geneva23******229****354**635**

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Notes: Multiyear results are from rolling American Community Survey. * Margin of error between 20% & 35% of estimate; ** margin of error between 35% & 50%; *** margin of error greater than 50%. The Census Bureau asks people to identify their race (white, African-American, etc.) separate from their ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic). So the totals for these categories cannot be added together, as people show up in both a racial and ethnic group.




Households Receiving SNAP by Race/Ethnicity, 2008-12
AsianBlack or African AmericanLatino or HispanicWhite
United States6%25%20%9%
NYS12%26%30%9%
NYS (excluding NYC)6%27%18%8%
Region8%**39%35%8%
Monroe8%**40%37%7%
Surrounding Counties8%******33%**24%**9%
Genesee27%******40%****35%******8%
Livingston10%******40%******36%******10%
Ontario3%******13%******25%****8%
Orleans7%******24%******13%******14%
Seneca29%******N/A******22%******9%
WayneN/A******52%**17%******10%
WyomingN/A******N/A******43%******9%
YatesN/A******100%******23%******12%
Rochester23%**45%46%19%
Batavia49%******55%****73%******12%
CanandaiguaN/A******N/A******57%******14%**
Geneva19%******21%******36%****14%**

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Notes: Multiyear results are from rolling American Community Survey. * Margin of error between 20% & 35% of estimate; ** margin of error between 35% & 50%; *** margin of error greater than 50%. The Census Bureau asks people to identify their race (white, African-American, etc.) separate from their ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic). So the totals for these categories cannot be added together, as people show up in both a racial and ethnic group.




Number of Households Receiving SNAP by Race/Ethnicity, 2008-12
AsianBlack or African AmericanLatino or HispanicWhite
United States298,7413,519,6772,630,0637,982,426
NYS53,483272,704306,963460,489
NYS (excluding NYC)6,57785,73650,819278,428
Region660**17,1176,77633,171
Monroe589**16,1206,00416,689
Surrounding Counties71******997**772**16,482
Genesee21******210****137******1,828
Livingston19******63******110******2,229
Ontario8******101******263****3,271
Orleans6******133******48******2,109
Seneca17******0******24******1,167
Wayne0******458**142******3,448
Wyoming0******0******38******1,313
Yates0******32******10******1,117
Rochester477**14,5075,0118,508
Batavia20******193****115******724
Canandaigua0******0******29******679**
Geneva8******85******168****613**

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Notes: Multiyear results are from rolling American Community Survey. * Margin of error between 20% & 35% of estimate; ** margin of error between 35% & 50%; *** margin of error greater than 50%. The Census Bureau asks people to identify their race (white, African-American, etc.) separate from their ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic). So the totals for these categories cannot be added together, as people show up in both a racial and ethnic group.







Worse than NYS by 10% or more
Up to 10% worse than NYS
Equal to or better than NYS


INDICATORS - Grouped by Topic REGIONAL VALUE YEAR NYS COMPARISON TREND | REGION
*No or multiple regional values for this indicator


Worse than NYS by 10% or more
Up to 10% worse than NYS
Equal to or better than NYS





Loading...